Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1203426, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20237655

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Many patients with chronic inflammatory dermatosis such as psoriasis usually ask about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination and if it would affect the course of their disease. Indeed, many case reports, case series and clinical studies, reporting psoriasis exacerbation following vaccination against COVID-19, were published during the pandemic. Also, many questions arise regarding the existence of exacerbating factors of these flare ups, including environmental triggers such as the insufficiency of vitamin D levels. Methods: This is a retrospective study that measures alterations in psoriasis activity and severity index (PASI) not exceeding 2 weeks after the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccinations in the reported cases and assesses whether such changes have any association with patients' vitamin D levels. We retrospectively reviewed the case records of all patients with a documented flare up after COVID-19 vaccination in our department as well as those who did not, during a year. Results: Among them, we found 40 psoriasis patients that had reported vitamin D levels in the form of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D within 3 weeks after vaccination, including 23 with exacerbation and 17 without exacerbation. Performing χ2 and t-test controls for psoriasis patients with and without flare-ups, a statistically significant dependence emerged in the seasons of summer [χ2(1) = 5.507, p = 0.019], spring [χ2(1) = 11.429, p = 0.001] and in the categories of vitamin D [χ2(2) = 7.932, p = 0.019], while the mean value of vitamin D for psoriasis patients who did not have exacerbation (31.14 ± 6.67 ng/mL) is statistically higher [t(38) = 3.655, p = 0.001] than the corresponding value of psoriasis patients who had an exacerbation (23.43 ± 6.49 ng/mL). Discussion: This study indicates that psoriasis patients with insufficient (21-29 ng/mL) or inadequate (<20 ng/mL) levels of vitamin D are more prone to postvaccination aggravation of the disease while vaccination in summer, a period with the most extent photo-exposition, can be a protective factor.

2.
Immunol Res ; 2023 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283201

ABSTRACT

Several cases of vaccine-associated manifestations have been published including cases of inflammatory myositis. Herein, we comprehensively review the literature on the occasion of case of a woman with inflammatory myositis following COVID-19 vaccination. A 67-year-old woman presented with left arm edema, rash, and weakness after the 2nd dose of the BTN162b2 vaccine. Raised muscle enzymes and inflammatory markers with muscle edema on MRI and myositis findings on the electromyogram established the diagnosis. She was successfully treated with methylprednisolone pulses, intravenous immunoglobulin, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine. Cases of inflammatory myositis, dermatomyositis, or interstitial lung disease with myositis-specific autoantibodies or myositis-associated autoantibodies within 12 weeks from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were included. Cases with malignancy, prior or subsequent COVID-19 infection, preexisting myositis/interstitial lung disease (ILD)/dermatomyositis (DM), or other connective tissue diseases were excluded. From our search, 49 cases were identified (mean age: 56.55 + 17.17 years), 59% were women, while 12 patients received the ChAdOx1 vaccine, 27 the BNT162b2, 8 the mRNA-1273, 1 the DB15806, and 1 the Ad26.COV2.S (overall, 70% received mRNA vaccines). Muscle involvement was the most common manifestation (79.5%), followed by skin involvement (53%) and ILD (34.6%), which were more common in the m-RNA vaccinees. Muscle biopsy, MRI findings, and autoantibody profile varied significantly, while successful immunosuppressive treatment was applied in most cases. Inflammatory myositis after COVID-19 vaccination has been well documented worldwide. Current evidence in support of a pathogenic link is challenging due to significant variation in clinical manifestations, radiological, histopathological, and immunological features.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL